Points raised / Suggestion made

Remarks given

(1)   Thiru J. Winford, Councilor, Poonamallee

(a)

He stated that at present the Local Bodies are delegated powers to issue PP only for ordinary buildings and requested to give delegation of powers to Local Bodies to issue PP for other types pf buildings also.

The Local bodies are delegated powers to for issuance of PP for (a) category of activities under DCR including ordinary buildings. For other category of buildings, which are of higher order, the Local bodies do not have adequate technical man power to process the PP cases, and hence powers were not delegated for the present.

(b)

For S.No. 505 Town Survey was done in the year 1900 during the British Regime as per the Ryathuvari account 34 hectares in this S.No. is classified as Cheri Natham as per the Town Survey there are 1300 survey numbers in Poonamallee Village which is  not reflected in the First Master Plan as well as Second Master Plan land use maps.

Based on the Litho Maps the First Master Plan and Second Master Plan base maps have been prepared. The litho maps were published in the year 1931, which is subsequent to the said Town survey.
The Councilor was requested to produce the latest approved with subdivision details if any duly authenticated by Deputy Tasildhars.  FMB for S.No. 595 for incorporation in the draft M.P.II.

(c)

He requested to classify the Survey Number 595 as Mixed Residential use zone from the proposed institutional use zone in the draft M.P II.

The suggestion will be examined based on its merits, provided patta to prove that it is a private land is produced.

(2)

Thiru. Muthu kumar, Thirumazhisai.

He informed that he owns a plot in an unauthorized layout laid in 1993; whether it is regularisable.

The plots in an unauthorised layout laid prior to 31.12.1989 are regularisable subject to certain norms and conditions.

(3)

Thiru. R. Shankar, Councilor, Poonamallee

He wanted to know whether Tamil version of Master Plan is available.

Tamil version of draft Master Plan II has been published and available for sale at a cost of Rs.200. It can also be accessed and down loaded free of cost from the official web site of CMDA.

In view of developments in the western corridor the jurisdiction of CMDA may be extended up to Sriperampudur.

The suggestion is taken note of.

(4)

He informed that Poonamallee Town Panchayat area part of Mangadu village has been included and due to cross jurisdiction problem they have to depend on both Poonamallee Town Panchayat and Mangadu Revenue authorities which creates lot of inconvenience to the public. He requested to sort out this issue.

The subject is related to jurisdiction cross over which has to be sorted out by Revenue department and Directorate of Town Panchayat. He may directly represent to directorate of Town Panchayat in the matter.

(5)

He stressed the importance of physical education and requested to earmark specific areas for high-class stadium facilities in consultation with sports development authorities.

Master Plan is a broad land use plan and the suggestion is related to specific allocation of an area for a specific purpose, which will be addressed at the time of preparation of DDPs.

(6)

He wanted to know whether MSB would be permitted in Poonamallee area.

In the draft Master Plan II it has been proposed to permit MSBs all over CMA including Poonamallee area, provided it satisfies the MSB Rules.

In view of increasing land cost the FSI should be increased.

There is no change in the current FSI. Since MSBs are proposed to be permitted in rest of CMA higher FSI is allowable in case of MSB developments.